AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Sudo apt upgrade error12/4/2023 are available in an apt repo and you update your sources to choose bullseye, apt will be able to dist-upgrade/full-upgrade correctly, and you can remove the transitional packages after the upgrade is done. Once these new "transitional" libgcc1 etc. sudo apt-get update fail on Ubuntu 17. You will then need to put this into an apt repo: do not just install it directly because these will replace the essential, real libgcc, which will keep you from running apt! Making a repo is beyond the scope here, check another question or just use the repo I already made. # Build a package - add `-arch i386` to make a 32-bit build # - "Version" to something larger than the old version: 10.1.0-1 works # edit equivs control file: you will need to set: (You may need to do this on a different system or undo your repo changes, to be able to install equivs!) Once equivs is installed, you'll want to do something like this for each of the package renames: # create equivs control file named libgcc1 You can use the equivs package to make your own empty packages. Since I know link-only answers are frowned upon, here's approximately what my workaround effectively does: There's more details about the problem, and instructions to use my workaround, over there. I have done this over at (including a repo to add with the packages). The way to really solve the problem, at least until a fix in the distro, is to provide "real" (but empty "transitional") packages named using the old name, that depend on the package's new name. I am not familiar with the details of the internals ofĭependency resolution and installation order, but that's how I understand the Package that is only "provide"d by the newer package, since it's trying to notīreak your system. The newly-renamed packages have a Provides: libgcc1 (etc.) property, but itĪppears that apt is preferring a real (old) libgcc1 package over a virtual lib32gcc1 -> lib32gcc-s1 (on 64 bit architectures only).lib64gcc1 -> lib64gcc-s1 (on 32 bit architectures only).The following packages were renamed (to match stated convention/debian policy more closely, I think): W: GPG error: any InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7E65990E879472FĮ: The repository ' any InRelease' is not signed.This is an apparent bug with the gcc-10 packages in Debian: they renamed a package and removed the transitional packages before the release of Bullseye. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. After trying any one of the above solutions, run the update command to ensure the dependencies are resolved and broken packages are fixed or removed. GPG error: stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1F3045A5DF7587C3 Skype Linux Client Repository Į: The repository ' bionic Release' does not have a Release file. This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. This question is not about programming or software development. W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7E65990E879472F Get:20 bionic-updates/universe i386 Packages Įrr:20 bionic-updates/universe i386 Packages Last modification reported: Sat, 00:41:53 +0000 The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1F3045A5DF7587C3 Skype Linux Client Repository Įrr:14 bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages Get:14 bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages Get:13 bionic-updates/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata Get:12 bionic-updates/main Translation-en Get:11 bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages Get:10 bionic-updates/main i386 Packages Whenever I try sudo apt-get update, I get these errors: (Btw I referred to this link - apt-get update says E: Sub-process returned an error code, and tried the suggestions but that didnt work for me.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |