AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Srware iron updates12/7/2023 ![]() There is no point in building one for the 32-bit version, because this has been pinned at version 88, and labelled "legacy". This is only for the 64-bit browser package. Accordingly, I've whipped up a similar updater script for the 64-bit Iron browser, which appears to work every bit as effectively. Now then following successful implementation of an included updater script in my Chrome-portable builds, I've managed to obtain a correct download URL for the SRWare Iron. You can add a Menu entry from wherever it's located. Click to enter, click the appropriate 'LAUNCH script to fire 'er up. ![]() In that respect, at least, it's all good stuff!Īs usual, you can find this at the normal link in post #1.ĭ/l unzip move it wherever you want. Again, if you want shot of it, rt-click on it and de-select it.Īside from all this idiocy, everything's as smooth as so much oiled silk, which we've come to expect from the Iron team by now. There's also the 'Reading List' function, to the right of the 'Other bookmarks' icon on the Bookmarks toolbar. All the new Chromium 'clones' have now got this why the Chromium dev team ever thought it a good idea to move this out of the general settings, I'll never know. It's picked up the annoying extra bits'n'bobs from Chromium the window title bar is back showing by default, until you rt-click on the tab bar and de-select 'Use system title bar & borders'. We've reached the limit of my ability to make newer releases compatible with older Puppies for what the browser now requires, you nearly have to rebuild an older Puppy into a newer one. (As with Chrome, I've left v91 available for those of you running older Puppies. Without further ado, here's the Puppy-portable version of v.0, based on Chromium 93. It's once again been almost 3 months since Iron 91 hit the shelves. Ironportable.png (30.86 KiB) Viewed 1215 timesįINALLY!!! I was beginning to think the SRWare team had forgotten about us again here in Linux-land. I'm sorry if this seems like a stupid question but I am genuinely confused as to whether I should be able to download a 64 bit v or not. 0 (which is the one I've just downloaded from your link) or v which is the one mentioned in the title of the thread. I am pretty sure I'm using the 64 bit version of iron (please see attached image).Ĭan you tell me if the most up to date 64 bit version of iron is v. I then wondered if I'd downloaded the 32 bit version by mistake but I did not think it would have worked in the 64 bit easyOS v2.9 in which I am using it with to make this post. 0 and not v as the the title of the thread suggests. ![]() I downloaded the 64 bit version from your link but when I opened it and checked the version it reported as v. In this case the issue is with the 64 bit version of Iron which I was updating. ![]() Usually I am looking for 32 bit versions but as you know I've bee trying to move away from my favourite 32 bit pups because of the 32 bit browser issues. I think I warned you a while back this was happening in fact, I'm sure I did. The final 32-bit version is now 'pinned' as a 'legacy' build on their website. SRWare quit building the 32-bit browser after v89. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |